3 hrs
Spent on manual QA every week, per engineer.
Ito automatically tests every PR. No test writing. No infrastructure to maintain.
no credit card required
3 hrs
Spent on manual QA every week, per engineer.
Under 40%
Of post-merge bugs are caught manually.
10% to 20%
Of engineering time goes to maintaining E2E tests.
On purpose.
Hiring QA engineers
Adds headcount, not velocity. Manual testing doesn't scale. You've traded one coordination problem for another.
Building E2E infrastructure
Playwright, Selenium, CI pipelines. Senior engineers pulled off product work. Ongoing maintenance. Flaky tests. Slow erosion of trust.
Accepting slower releases
Every extra day in the release cycle is a day your competitors are shipping. Thoroughness is good. Thoroughness that costs you the market is not.
Ito doesn't add work. It removes work that shouldn't exist.
Common questions from engineering managers, senior engineers, and QA leads.